TempleOS: Naughty Fun with OS Internals [video]

Re:TempleOS: Naughty Fun with OS Internals [video] by chris_wot on Sunday January 03, 2016 @10:45AM (#10830947)

I'm not making fun here, but I honestly want to see him going to the VMWare's office and demanding that they implement his RedSea filesystem on pain of eternal damnation.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:TempleOS: Naughty Fun with OS Internals [video] by CyberDildonics on Sunday January 03, 2016 @11:30AM (#10831114)

I'm not sure who would down vote you, he literally says this in the video.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:TempleOS: Naughty Fun with OS Internals [video] by wichsen on Sunday January 03, 2016 @01:45PM (#10831681)

Warning: OT

CyberDildonics is quite the amusing account: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=CyberDildonics

It appears to be used extensively for posting comments just like this one!

Personally, I am a fan.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:TempleOS: Naughty Fun with OS Internals [video] by pekk on Sunday January 03, 2016 @01:07PM (#10831501)

I wish the industry culture was fun enough to actually implement it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:TempleOS: Naughty Fun with OS Internals [video] by Rangi42 on Sunday January 03, 2016 @01:19PM (#10831553)

Perhaps someone could sneak it in as "further support for FAT32 variants." According to Terry, RedSea is "similar to FAT32, but with absolute block addresses instead of clusters, fixed-sized 64-byte directory entries and no FAT table, just an allocation bitmap" [1].

[1]: http://www.templeos.org/Wb/Doc/RedSea.html

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:TempleOS: Naughty Fun with OS Internals [video] by GFK_of_xmaspast on Sunday January 03, 2016 @09:20PM (#10833682)

What could vmware possibly have done to deserve that.

[ Parent | on HN ]