Re:Bing Goes Full-On Censorship in English Search Results Wi...
by skj on Sunday January 03, 2016 @12:27AM
(#10829632)
Any source about this "voluntary PRISM-like setup for the NSA"? And that this thing was the hack vector?
Re:Bing Goes Full-On Censorship in English Search Results Wi...
by magicalist on Sunday January 03, 2016 @12:44AM
(#10829675)
I assume it's
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/chine...
but it wasn't "PRISM-like", it was an internal database of accounts under court ordered surveillance (in this case, orders specifically "issued under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act"), and it wasn't the attack vector, it was apparently the attack target.
http://www.economist.com/blogs/analects/2014/02/internet-cen...
I still remember when Google exited China and Microsoft tried to take advantage of that by being an even bigger lapdog than it was before to the Chinese government. Unfortunately for Microsoft, that didn't even work in gaining it more market share, so it may have been trying to please its Chinese masters for nothing:
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-microsoft-china-insight-id...
Of course, when Google got hacked back in 2010, it was through its own voluntarily setup PRISM-like access point for the NSA, so I guess there are no "innocent" parties here. It's still disappointing to see these companies making it easier for governments to control/arrest/assassinate their citizens through censorship and surveillance. Hopefully history will not look with favor upon these actions (although IBM still seems to be doing pretty well decades later after its Nazi genocide collaboration and Cisco is still making a lot of money after starting to sell surveillance-enabled routers in China and worldwide many years ago).