News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Response to Paul Graham’s Article on Income Inequality by dnautics on Saturday January 02, 2016 @04:31PM (#10828052)
You do understand that this is basically the argument that slaveowners used to justify continuing slavery in the 19th century?
Re:A Response to Paul Graham’s Article on Income Inequality by nickbauman on Saturday January 02, 2016 @04:54PM (#10828157)
It would be a mistake to say I'm advocating slavery by making this comparison. The slave to a master is just like an automobile: you have to put gas into it to make it go. Turning a human being into something the equivalent of an automobile is an abomination. But I don't really think wage slavery is really all that different at the end of the day. My point is both are abominable.
Re:A Response to Paul Graham’s Article on Income Inequality by dnautics on Saturday January 02, 2016 @05:03PM (#10828207)
that may have not been your intent, but it does reveal the error in your thinking. You may call both abominable, but do you not see the fundamental reason why one is categorically worse than the other? If not then you are doomed to advocate for the very problems that were the root of the atrocity of slavery, just in other, possibly more cryptic and slyly paternalistic forms.
Re:A Response to Paul Graham’s Article on Income Inequality by marshray on Saturday January 02, 2016 @04:52PM (#10828147)
Except that no one is justifying slavery, it's just the opposite.
Re:A Response to Paul Graham’s Article on Income Inequality by horsecaptin on Saturday January 02, 2016 @04:53PM (#10828152)
You know it is a good time to re-think the current economical distribution when the slavery looks like a valid alternative to the status quo.