News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Privilege, Pathology and Power by zepto on Friday January 01, 2016 @05:16PM (#10823744)
Could be both. But in the case of trump, his wealth was inherited, so the argument goes in the direction Krugman states.
Re:Privilege, Pathology and Power by setra on Friday January 01, 2016 @05:28PM (#10823794)
which he increased by an order of magnitude.
Re:Privilege, Pathology and Power by zepto on Friday January 01, 2016 @07:00PM (#10824227)
It was gigantic to begin with, and he has performed about as well as an index fund over his period in business, avoiding bankruptcy only by fluke.
Re:Privilege, Pathology and Power by setra on Friday January 01, 2016 @10:04PM (#10824764)
He goes from tens of millions is assets to billions. A fluke you say. If that was so easy we would have a lot more billionaires. Investment choices are always obvious after the fact.
Re:Privilege, Pathology and Power by zepto on Saturday January 02, 2016 @11:22AM (#10826606)
I said the avoiding of bankruptcy was a fluke. And yes, it is certainly the case that if more people inherited $40 million when Trump did, we'd have many more billionaires today since a conservative investment strategy over the same period would have made them so.

https://www.quora.com/Did-Donald-Trump-inherit-a-lot-of-mone...