Not sure if the author is in this thread but your article was great in both content and style. The point you were communicating was definitely not trivial: I hadn't thought of "what was said" vs "what as valued" that way before, or at least had not simplified that part of my mental model to see that. The way you communicated with examples was also spot on: at no point did I feel like I have to go back to read a certain part here or there to understand.

Excellent show!