News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Requiem for Ian Murdock by kevindeasis on Thursday December 31, 2015 @02:01PM (#10819047)
That statement was about collective identity. Everyone has a collective identity.

You are free to choose your own collective identity. Do whatever you want. If you say that you are not part of any collective identity, I'm not sure about that...

Re:A Requiem for Ian Murdock by mc808 on Friday January 01, 2016 @01:14AM (#10821237)
I try very hard to avoid any collective identity for myself, even to the extent where a lot of people would say "I am a [verb]er," I consciously prefer "I [verb]."

The collective identity mindset opens people up to manipulation, guilt by association, and undeserved praise by association (which sounds nice but can lead to poor decisions based on a distorted sense of self). Any benefits are comparatively small. You can still go [verb] with the [verb]ers without merging your identity and worldview with theirs.

Re:A Requiem for Ian Murdock by johnchristopher on Thursday December 31, 2015 @10:43PM (#10821036)
There should be a Russel point just like there is a Godwin point.
Re:A Requiem for Ian Murdock by kevindeasis on Thursday December 31, 2015 @11:41PM (#10821113)
It's only right to balance the availability of internet adage. Might as well call it Russell's Law.