Re:Wikipedia fails as an encyclopedia, to science’s detriment
by vilhelm_s on Tuesday December 29, 2015 @06:45PM
(#10809846)
But who are the hypothetical readers who need to understand the camera matrix without knowing math? In general, my feeling is that most Wikipedia articles are pretty well pitched to the people that would be interested in the article topic.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Wikipedia fails as an encyclopedia, to science’s detriment
by ollifi on Tuesday December 29, 2015 @07:38PM
(#10810056)
Camera projections are very common technique in computer graphics and software often refer to this kind of terminology. When I try to get better understanding what they actually mean I often find wikipedia articles lacking. It's like looking up a traditional food and finding only receipe.
Re:Wikipedia fails as an encyclopedia, to science’s detriment
by tshadwell on Wednesday December 30, 2015 @07:00AM
(#10811738)
I'm not sure that the idea that an encyclopaedia should be targeted to only the already well educated, especially one with the goal that Wikipedia has is much short of elitism.