Re:Bertha back on the move after 2 years of delays
by chrismcb on Sunday December 27, 2015 @09:20PM
(#10799522)
The area beneath the viaduct would make a horrible freeway. It is, and should be turned into a park with limited vehicle access. There is to much foot traffic in that area. There are better ways to redirect traffic around downtown Seattle without going directly beneath the viaduct
Re:Bertha back on the move after 2 years of delays
by chrismcb on Sunday December 27, 2015 @09:05PM
(#10799478)
The area beneath the viaduct would make a horrible freeway. It is, and should be turned into a park with limited vehicle access. There is to much foot traffic in that area. There are better ways to redirect traffic around downtown Seattle without going directly beneath the viaduct
So, a few options were proposed to replace it:
1. Surface highway
2. Cut and cover tunnel
3. Deep bore tunnel
A surface highway is, by far, the simplest option to implement: you knock down the viaduct, and repave the area underneath it (there's already a road under the viaduct—it just needs expansion).
The viaduct is a death trap, and it will kill some or all of the people on it when it comes down. There is absolutely no question about that in my mind whatsoever. For that reason, I absolutely refuse to set foot on it. There's going to be political hell to pay when it collapses and Seattleites are re-reminded that there was no reason why anyone had to die on a highway everyone knew was unsafe.