News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Moore's law hits the roof by nordsieck on Sunday December 27, 2015 @03:55PM (#10798738)
The reason this will never happen in the way you're imagining it, is yields. 16 GB of ram is just too much die area.

In a small way, this has already happened, though. The intel Iris Pro has 1.5 GB of basically 4th level cache, shared between the GPU and the CPU.

I could see memory on the package, though, which might generate some of the benefits you're looking for.

Re:Moore's law hits the roof by yazaddaruvala on Sunday December 27, 2015 @04:31PM (#10798836)
Interesting!

Given that RAM is relatively simple, I wouldn't have expected yields to be such an issue. Also, since the marginal cost of a CPU is relatively low, I figured again, it wouldn't be a large hit to Intel's bottom line to overcome the yields or to give out new chips through warranty.

Remember that for buyers, RAM and CPUs are marked up significantly. A combined CPU RAM unit, would be justified to have increased price over just a CPU. As long as CPU-RAM Unit cost <= CPU + RAM, buyers wouldn't mind and society would end up better as a whole. Potentially making it worthwhile for Intel, regardless of loss in yield.

I am not very educated on the subject though, so I'll defer to your knowledge on it, and agree.

Re:Moore's law hits the roof by Narishma on Monday December 28, 2015 @07:32AM (#10800843)
> The intel Iris Pro has 1.5 GB of basically 4th level cache, shared between the GPU and the CPU.

You mean 128 MB?

Re:Moore's law hits the roof by nordsieck on Monday December 28, 2015 @10:17AM (#10801460)
Whopse.