Re:Geek behaviors present during conversations
by idlewords on Tuesday January 26, 2010 @04:55PM
(#1079004)
If you're in a formal business meeting, then you're in a social situation that has nothing to do with the focus of this article, which is informal two-way conversation.
Re:Geek behaviors present during conversations
by ShabbyDoo on Wednesday January 27, 2010 @10:39AM
(#1080694)
I agree that group interaction was not the focus of the article, but the parent comment seemed more general. Also, to a lesser degree, I think this unfortunate social rule applies in person-to-person interaction. "Why did you not bother to object yesterday when I told you of our group's plans?"
In more informal social situations, I don't think this odd social rule is an issue though. After all, if I start talking to somebody at Starbucks about his laptop, it's hard for him to later claim I had an obligation to help him choose the right wireless dongle -- even if he mis-stated his needs for G vs. N connectivity.
Re:Geek behaviors present during conversations
by dkarl on Tuesday January 26, 2010 @05:21PM
(#1079069)
A good comeback for this is, "You can't expect me to correct all the bullshit Gary spouts. I don't have the time or a strong enough speaking voice. I'd be hoarse within a week."
Re:Geek behaviors present during conversations
by eru on Tuesday January 26, 2010 @06:58PM
(#1079293)
It's highly context-depended whether you can pull this comeback.
Re:Geek behaviors present during conversations
by harisenbon on Wednesday January 27, 2010 @12:56AM
(#1079887)
Yeah, I mean what if the guy's name is Bob?
I understand letting some non-essential facts slide if there's little threat that they can be used against you later, but US culture (at least Midwestern business culture) dictates near immediate rebuttal -- no matter how gauche.