News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Kim Dotcom loses extradition case by djsumdog on Wednesday December 23, 2015 @05:32AM (#10782773)
> The US is not so all-powerful that it can compel governments to act against their own best interest, only powerful enough to align interests, by hook or crook.

What world do you live in? The United States often compels governments to act against their own interests. The 1973 US backed coup leading to the death of 11,000 civilians. The Iranian-Contras. The School of the Americas, which literally trained terrorists in South America, Iraq!

Thirty years from now, declassified information will show the US caused the rebellion in Libya and that the US directly funded ISIS.

Granted New Zealand is a Commonwealth State and it'd be much more difficult to go to war with a developed English speaking nation, but they are still under the thumb of the US/UK empire. They ruled the spying on Kim Dotcom was illegal, then changed the laws to make it retroactively legal...and also allow the GCHB to spy on anyone they want.

Re:Kim Dotcom loses extradition case by flyryan on Wednesday December 23, 2015 @08:09AM (#10783091)
I wish I could base my arguments on things that are going to happen 30 years from now.
Re:Kim Dotcom loses extradition case by gcb0 on Wednesday December 23, 2015 @09:57AM (#10783580)
for NZ, the USA based companies signed a deal to film several multi million dollars movies there on the same week the NZ feds agreed to press charges and arrest Kim Dotcom. including the hobbit, which also donated a renovated international airport to the country (hobbit themed no less)

if you want to think the US industry most interested in the copyright law there moving all that money at the right time is just a coincidence, suit yourself.

Re:Kim Dotcom loses extradition case by zaphar on Wednesday December 23, 2015 @11:49AM (#10784162)
To be fair the landscape of NZ was highly suitable to the filming of a Movie like the Hobbit. There were far better reasons for them to be filming there than the Dotcom case. Enough better reasons that it's reasonable to conclude the timing in the case was coincidental.

I suspect that it's also not unusual for Hollywood to sweeten the pot when they want to film somewhere with donations of various types.

The connection between the case and those films is extremely tenuous.

Re:Kim Dotcom loses extradition case by snori74 on Wednesday December 23, 2015 @02:58PM (#10785264)
It is a bit unusual for Hollywood to get laws passed in their favour in foreign countries - http://www.theguardian.com/business/2010/oct/31/warner-bros-...