News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Kim Dotcom loses extradition case by yarou on Tuesday December 22, 2015 @11:51PM (#10782025)
It's surprising that New Zealand bends over backwards for the United States like this.

There are numerous Latin American countries with known narcoterrorists and traffickers that refuse to extradite their criminals to the US, even though their criminals had a direct impact on the lives of US citizens.

On the other hand, Kim Schmitz' crimes are relatively benign compared to those committed by narcoterrorists. It just goes to show how backwards the priorities are for our politicians.

Re:Kim Dotcom loses extradition case by tim333 on Wednesday December 23, 2015 @12:12AM (#10782083)
Or perhaps that New Zealand believes in prosecuting criminals while the Latin American countries with known narcoterrorists aren't that bothered?
Re:Kim Dotcom loses extradition case by such_a_casual on Wednesday December 23, 2015 @12:55AM (#10782187)
I have no reason to believe this is the reason, but New Zealand does benefit from the movie industry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Films_shot_in_New_Zea...

Keep in mind a 6 company oligarchy controls almost all of the media coming out of the United States.

The United States has a lot more resources than New Zealand. So there are plenty of other ways for them to incentivize cooperation. I just thought I'd throw out this random fact that a significant amount of films are shot there.

Re:Kim Dotcom loses extradition case by leohutson on Wednesday December 23, 2015 @07:33AM (#10783007)
Most countries have had films shot in them. Globally, the film industry does seem to have unusually strong sway with politicians though, considering the relatively small amount of money and people involved.

With regards to dotcom's extradition, I do think the initial raid on his house was an absolute disgrace, but it seems pretty unlikely that he would have had the grace of the court this long in any other OECD country, although that's partly because of the idiotically bungled warrants. The extradition process would have been much faster from the UK for example. [1]

As a rule, our judges are typically not very cooperative with our government [2], let alone foreign ones.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK%E2%80%93US_extradition_trea...

[2] http://www.stuff.co.nz/nelson-mail/69299045/judge-critical-o...

Re:Kim Dotcom loses extradition case by djsumdog on Wednesday December 23, 2015 @05:41AM (#10782785)
Weta Digital. Complete scum shop based in Wellington. They do an incredible amount of movie animation and work employees insane hours. Fuck them.
Re:Kim Dotcom loses extradition case by anonbanker on Saturday December 26, 2015 @02:01AM (#10793527)
This is the first negative Weta comment I've ever seen. You guys need to spread this message further.
Re:Kim Dotcom loses extradition case by solipsism on Wednesday December 23, 2015 @12:11AM (#10782079)
I don't really understand your point. You blame our politicians for the fact that Latin American countries refuse to extradite criminals?
Re:Kim Dotcom loses extradition case by digler999 on Wednesday December 23, 2015 @01:03AM (#10782203)
The point is that there was a full SWAT team raid, home invasion, and helicopters to catch a fucking movie pirate. That is what they expend their resources on. It's ridiculous.
Re:Kim Dotcom loses extradition case by dcposch on Wednesday December 23, 2015 @04:56AM (#10782693)
Not a "movie pirate", someone who watched a pirated movie.

He ran a business and made 8 figures selling other peoples content without permission.