Re:EFF to Court: Lifetime GPS Tracking Violates the Fourth A...
by afarrell on Tuesday December 22, 2015 @07:35PM
(#10781328)
This argument seems based much more in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3 of the original text of the constitution. Quoth: "No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed."
Re:EFF to Court: Lifetime GPS Tracking Violates the Fourth A...
by tptacek on Tuesday December 22, 2015 @08:34PM
(#10781515)
Ok, this part makes perfect sense: it's clearly unjust to add penalties to sentences after the sentencing phase of the trial is complete.
I'm just wondering if there's an argument here past retroactive sentencing.
The point is, punishments can only be applied to sentences pronounced from this point on, not ones that have already been served or are in the process of being served.