Where are you getting that from? The median personal income is very close to 30K. The median household income isn't even 56K.
And where did you get 40K per year for total cost at a public university, the average is closer to 20K.
Furthermore, why are you including cost of living for college students but not for workers when calculating the opportunity cost?
>If you're going to attend a university, don't do it for money. That's a really stupid rationale.
Even if you're calculations were correct, they're only correct for generic "college". If you plan on choosing a major that pays better than average, even with your calculations, attending university for the money would still be a net win.
The data is clearly sourced it the wikipedia article. Your data is either old or just wrong.
> Furthermore, why are you including cost of living for college students but not for workers when calculating the opportunity cost?
That's a fair point. You will still incur costs that you wouldn't otherwise, like books, etc.
> If you plan on choosing a major that pays better than average
Where is the evidence the increase in earnings is the result of the degree rather than selection bias? Correlation is not causation.
Point me to the line in that article that says that.
Here is a quote from the 2nd paragraph.
"The overall median personal income for all individuals over the age of 18 was $24,062[6] ($32,140 for those age 25 or above) in the year 2005.[7] The overall median income for all 155 million persons over the age of 15 who worked with earnings in 2005 was $28,567.[8]"
Where are you getting 56k from?
>Where is the evidence the increase in earnings is the result of the degree rather than selection bias? Correlation is not causation.
That is entirely possible, but many studies have attempted to correct for this. Here is a good summary of several.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/28/upshot/the-value-of-colleg...
There are also a few other problems with your formula. $30k is way too high for an 18 year old just out of high school. And again, 20k per year is closer to the average total yearly cost of a public school.
Let's say 20k per year in income which is much closer to the median starting salary for an 18 year old. Let's also say that if it costs a college student 10k a year to live that it only costs a non-college student 5k to account for extra costs for the college student.
So we have 20k a year in lost income and 15k a year in costs over what the student would have paid had they not attended.
That's 4x20k + 4x15k = 140k. About half of your estimate.
That also doesn't take into account that college students are free during breaks to work, or take paid internships. College only takes about 30 weeks per year, while the workers will be working about 50 weeks out of the year. (Also Engineering and Computer Science internships in particular pay fairly well.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_income_in_the_United_...
15 years and older: $28,567
18 years and older: $24,062
25 years and older: $32,140
And note that we should not be using the median of the general population, but instead the median of the population that did not attain a bachelors degree and comparing that to the median of the population that did attain a bachelors, but no higher, degree.
Taking the unweighted average income of those over 25 years of age who have completed some high school, graduated high school, and completed some college and comparing it to those over 25 years of age who have attained a bachelors degree you come up with
($25,039 + $31,539 + $37,135) / 3 = $31,238 Income of those with a bachelors degree $50,944
I only meant to dispute the claim of @wyldfire that a difference of $640,000 (1987 USD) is "really small." Even this comment does not represent a rigorous assessment of the value of a college degree. See The College Payoff: Education, Occupations, Lifetime earnings [0] if you want that assessment.
[0] https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/55930...
Plug that into the formulas above and it's still nowhere near half after all the costs are factored in, although it's a far healthier percentage.
One thing that isn't noted though ... there is a fundamental difference between causation and correlation. There is no evidence to suggest colleges add that value. Merely that people who earn more go to college.
Why are you using 30K as the baseline? The median per capita income in the US is 56K [1].
40 years will earn you $2.24 million. Earning $640K or 29% more isn't as substantial as you make it out to be.
Let's also factor in 4 years lost income and cost of attending an institution.
(4 x 30K (starting salary)) + (4 x 40K (tuition/housing/food at a public university)) = 280K
$640K - 280K = 360K
360K is 16% of total earned income. That's not that much. We're also not factoring in interest, assuming you borrowed money to pay for that degree ... and let's not forget I'm quoting prices for a public university while the $640K figure includes some very expensive colleges that might put you in the red.
If you're going to attend a university, don't do it for money. That's a really stupid rationale.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_income_in_the_United_...