News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Suburban Office Parks Increasingly Obsolete; Businesses C... by davidw on Monday December 21, 2015 @06:41PM (#10774451)
Interestingly, a couple of companies I worked for in Italy grew, and moved into office parks that were pretty difficult to reach without a car. Here in Bend, Oregon, I'm now at a company with offices downtown, in easy biking/walking distance from where I live. It's kind of ironic as Italy is, generally, a more walkable place than the US. I'm very happy, though, in any event.
Re:Suburban Office Parks Increasingly Obsolete; Businesses C... by Brakenshire on Monday December 21, 2015 @07:38PM (#10774764)
I'm not sure that Europe is actually much better than the US in terms of attitudes towards suburban/car-centric design, I think the reason why we have mostly avoided it is down simply to the historic patterns of development. Certainly in Britain, anywhere outside the major cities, most of the development seems to be extremely suburban - estates of tiny detached houses with tiny private gardens/yards, often just off a roundabout on a main road, tacked on to the edge of an existing town or village, without any idea about creating new public spaces, or walkability. Often these estates are mandated to have only one exit or entrance, in order to discourage crime (this is called 'security by design', and naturally kills any sense of a continuous settlement). This is still going full throttle even now.
Re:Suburban Office Parks Increasingly Obsolete; Businesses C... by syntheticnature on Thursday December 31, 2015 @12:24PM (#10818554)
I have heard that in Europe, taxation on property is based solely on the area, encouraging upward growth, while in the US the value of what you build on it also factors in. Therefore, in the US, a flat parking lot is not as expensive/wasteful as it would be in Europe. I can't speak to it generally, but it did seem my experiences of European downtown areas did not include private parking lots, but rather more parking garages.