News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fuck the Cloud (2009) by jacquesm on Monday December 21, 2015 @06:03PM (#10774214)
> These days that's often the cloud.

For plenty of use cases I actually agree with that conclusion. With the caveat that I would add: accompanied by a suitable non-cloud back-up of critical data, code and configuration data held on a medium that is not accessible by the same people that administer the cloud stuff.

Re:Fuck the Cloud (2009) by lmm on Monday December 21, 2015 @06:33PM (#10774418)
I think for most levels of safety you would target, a pure cloud solution is going to be cheaper. E.g. if you decide you need a backup that's independent of your primary cloud provider and any staff with access to that, you can probably accomplish that more cheaply with a second cloud provider than by self-hosting.
Re:Fuck the Cloud (2009) by jacquesm on Monday December 21, 2015 @07:48PM (#10774810)
Yes, a second cloud provider is a valid option, if you take a number of precautions (see elsewhere in this thread).