News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:My Own Patent Apologies (2014) by jb613 on Monday December 21, 2015 @04:51PM (#10773784)
> What service did you render to Square to earn the payment you claim to deserve?

the service rendered was he made public the details of the invention. Whether Square read or did not choose to read the patent is beside the point.

> Did they get the idea for their product from your patent? Did they learn how to implement their process from patent?

You are assuming that Square did not read his patent - which if true suggests that Square inefficiently re-invented the wheel. You know, that whole standing on the shoulders of giants thing.

However, what we find happening lately is the concept of efficient infringement where large corporations have found it more cost effective to infringe and fight with their lawyer muscle than to pay inventors their due rights.

Re:My Own Patent Apologies (2014) by coldpie on Monday December 21, 2015 @05:10PM (#10773908)
> the service rendered was he made public the details of the invention. Whether Square read or did not choose to read the patent is beside the point.

I completely disagree.

Re:My Own Patent Apologies (2014) by jb613 on Monday December 21, 2015 @05:24PM (#10773997)
what is:

1) http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=H...

2) www.google.ca/patents/US8396808

3) http://pat2pdf.org/patents/pat8396808.pdf

if not publicly disclosed?

Re:My Own Patent Apologies (2014) by jb613 on Monday December 21, 2015 @10:35PM (#10775640)
THIS got downvoted?!? People were either too lazy or couldn't come up with a rebuttal