News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Making a Three-Stone Hearth as Efficient as an Improved C... by dalke on Monday December 21, 2015 @04:26PM (#10773635)
I am unable to find that text in the article. I am even unable to find the word 'operator'.

In any case, I pointed out that there's a 3x difference between two houses, so I am in complete agreement with that statement. My post asks a different question, which is, what is the error range on the observed results? What are the odds that the stove doesn't actually have an effect on wood use, but that some other factor ('operator and the conditions of use') resulted in the observed differences?

Re:Making a Three-Stone Hearth as Efficient as an Improved C... by semi-extrinsic on Monday December 21, 2015 @05:17PM (#10773952)
Ah, sorry, tab mixup on my end, the quote is from another article linked in the comments below; http://www.lowtechmagazine.com/2014/06/thermal-efficiency-co...

Anyway, the question you pose is a good one.

Re:Making a Three-Stone Hearth as Efficient as an Improved C... by rasz_pl on Monday December 21, 2015 @09:48PM (#10775462)
Might be simple placebo effect, here have this super efficient stove.
Re:Making a Three-Stone Hearth as Efficient as an Improved C... by dalke on Tuesday December 22, 2015 @02:01AM (#10776304)
I think you mean Hawthorne effect?
Re:Making a Three-Stone Hearth as Efficient as an Improved C... by rasz_pl on Tuesday December 22, 2015 @02:17AM (#10776346)
I dont think so? They observed three families, but most likely told one of them all about the new amazingly efficient stove.
Re:Making a Three-Stone Hearth as Efficient as an Improved C... by dalke on Tuesday December 22, 2015 @03:02AM (#10776463)
"The Hawthorne effect (also referred to as the observer effect) is a type of reactivity in which individuals modify or improve an aspect of their behavior in response to their awareness of being observed."