News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fuck the Cloud (2009) by nsfyn55 on Monday December 21, 2015 @02:03PM (#10772751)
Oh you can't trust the FDIC they are government insured. And governments collapse all the time. I gave an example. Like a I said there is only one safe place for your money. Thats in your own private bank that you build and maintain yourself.
Re:Fuck the Cloud (2009) by LordKano on Monday December 21, 2015 @02:05PM (#10772756)
When is the last time the FDIC failed versus the last time an online storage vendor folded?
Re:Fuck the Cloud (2009) by nsfyn55 on Monday December 21, 2015 @02:47PM (#10772993)
Its true that FDIC has lost fewer deposits than S3 has lost objects, but as usual there is a caveat. There are 2,000,000,000,000 objects in S3. In order to make a comparison the FDIC would have to insure over 300 deposits for every man, woman, and child on the planet and maintain a failure rate of '0.000000001%' or The FDIC would have to operate in its current state continuously for many millennia without interruption. I don't get a sense that the contrarians here appreciate the numbers involved.
Re:Fuck the Cloud (2009) by LordKano on Monday December 21, 2015 @02:54PM (#10773039)
You're evading.

When was the last time the FDIC failed versus the last time an online storage vendor folded?

Re:Fuck the Cloud (2009) by jacquesm on Monday December 21, 2015 @03:30PM (#10773289)
Anybody who remembers nirvanix is going to have the willies just reading this thread, those who were caught by it will see red.

Personally I think the risk that AWS fails is remote, but if I were to store a bunch of data with them I'd most definitely make sure that I would not be dependent on them. It would be a convenience at best, but never a dependency.