Re:Uber-Style Flight-Sharing Service Shot Down by U.S. Court
by cwyers on Monday December 21, 2015 @01:40AM
(#10769928)
I don't have a problem with that, either. Uber drivers put a lot more stress on their cars than ordinary drivers do, but ordinarily the worst consequence of that is that someone gets stuck at the side of the road waiting for a tow truck. If the same holds true for Uber-but-for-planes, the consequences of that are potentially a lot more severe. Requiring that commercial flights are held to a different standard as far as aircraft maintenance and such, not just pilot licensing, makes a lot of sense to me.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Uber-Style Flight-Sharing Service Shot Down by U.S. Court
by fleitz on Monday December 21, 2015 @03:11AM
(#10770140)
There's maintenance standards for a reason if you put X hours on a plane you have to do the required maintence for X hours. Commercial licenses are much more about making sure the maintenance is actually done because people might skip the maintenance.
It doesn't matter whether passengers are paying or not, similar to how in cars if you put X KMs on it requires the same amount of maintenance.
Have you seen a taxi? They are regular cars. Just like an Uber...