News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Theranos Misled Me by rabidonrails on Sunday December 20, 2015 @11:41PM (#10769612)
They weren't "clear" on this. They said were all about their proprietary technology and getting everything from a pinprick when it turns out they weren't doing any of that.

It's like saying I have a great story to tell you but then reading you Moby Dick.

Re:How Theranos Misled Me by 21echoes on Monday December 21, 2015 @12:32AM (#10769738)
> when it turns out they weren't doing any of that

Except for the part where they had all 200 tests going through lab review... Is the doubt that they'll move on to getting more tests FDA approved once the first one passes full review?

Re:How Theranos Misled Me by padiyar83 on Sunday December 20, 2015 @11:54PM (#10769649)
They never once said they were not using existing machines to do these tests, not once, they only spoke about the quantity of the sample needed. Using the same analogy, saying I have a great story to tell you but then reading Moby Dick isn't necessarily cheating, because Moby Dick is a great story :).
Re:How Theranos Misled Me by rabidonrails on Sunday December 20, 2015 @11:56PM (#10769654)
Right, it's not cheating or lying, just kinda misleading.
Re:How Theranos Misled Me by padiyar83 on Monday December 21, 2015 @12:06AM (#10769670)
Agreed, they should have been upfront on what technology they developed in house and what it can and cannot do. A simple table outlining that could have cleared up the air.