News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Typed.pw: anonymous online content by jastanton on Monday December 21, 2015 @01:02AM (#10769823)
Warning to anyone following links to articles written, there is no sanitation of any of the content so javascript is freely executed. Warning against going to any of the articles created.
Re:Typed.pw: anonymous online content by contrahax on Monday December 21, 2015 @02:29AM (#10770032)
Like this hack: http://typed.pw/a/652
Re:Typed.pw: anonymous online content by xojoc on Monday December 21, 2015 @10:00AM (#10771325)
I had an old version of pandoc which didn't support pandoc -f markdown-raw_html now I updated it manually.

Take a look at http://typed.pw/a/652 and you'll see that it doesn't work anymore.

Re:Typed.pw: anonymous online content by sockopen on Monday December 21, 2015 @01:34AM (#10769917)
also no SSL certificate
Re:Typed.pw: anonymous online content by mirimir on Monday December 21, 2015 @02:21AM (#10770017)
Right, so intermediaries can see all content. And knowing your IP address, nothing is anonymous.
Re:Typed.pw: anonymous online content by xojoc on Monday December 21, 2015 @10:09AM (#10771374)
By anonymous I mostly mean that I don't require your name or email, there are no ads and I don't keep logs.

I will add a let's encrypt SSL cert though for more anonymity.

Re:Typed.pw: anonymous online content by mirimir on Monday December 21, 2015 @12:23PM (#10772166)
Cool. It'd also be good to clarify what you mean by "anonymous". Even Tor doesn't claim to be anonymous.
Re:Typed.pw: anonymous online content by xojoc on Monday December 21, 2015 @12:33PM (#10772204)
What I mean with "anonymous" is on the homepage. From typed.pw

> Write anonymously. No logs. No tracking. No name. No email.

Isn't clear enough? Should I add more details?

What do you think would be a better word instead of "anonymous"?

Re:Typed.pw: anonymous online content by mirimir on Monday December 21, 2015 @12:46PM (#10772268)
It's just that "anonymous" is such a loaded word. And many users still have magical faith in Internet anonymity.

I would warn people about the need to obfuscate IP address. Maybe point them to https://www.privacytools.io/.

Re:Typed.pw: anonymous online content by xojoc on Tuesday December 22, 2015 @03:14AM (#10776495)
Nice site. The only problem is that it never mentions free software or GNU/Linux. "Open source" has never been about the user. https://prism-break.org may be better.
Re:Typed.pw: anonymous online content by mirimir on Tuesday December 22, 2015 @04:17PM (#10780451)
That's a good site too.
Re:Typed.pw: anonymous online content by xojoc on Monday December 21, 2015 @10:02AM (#10771330)
Will a let's encrypt SSL certificate be ok? Previously I didn't have the money but now that it's gratis I have no excuses.
Re:Typed.pw: anonymous online content by CM30 on Monday December 21, 2015 @02:49AM (#10770079)
Layout seems like it needs a lot of work. Comes across as very... well, 1990s if you ask me. I mean, I don't expect something as pleasant to look at as say, Medium, but a site with at least a better colour scheme would work wonders here.

And the security stuff... yeah, that needs fixed too. Kind of surprised this wasn't thought about.

Re:Typed.pw: anonymous online content by xojoc on Monday December 21, 2015 @10:04AM (#10771343)
Any help with the layout/color scheme is much appreciated. Right now I love the way it looks. YMMV.

And I fixed the security hole.

Re:Typed.pw: anonymous online content by xojoc on Tuesday December 22, 2015 @03:20AM (#10776510)
I updated the styling. Should be better :).
Re:Typed.pw: anonymous online content by hollerith on Monday December 21, 2015 @04:12AM (#10770269)
Aaron Swartz's jottit.com is very similar to this.