News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Physicists and Philosophers Debate the Boundaries of Science by fengwick3 on Sunday December 20, 2015 @09:09PM (#10769187)
I don't think you seem to understand the argument here. Einstein is a prime example of a theorist whose bold theories predicted verifiable results, such as the Einstein Cross. The problem with modern theorists, as the article and the parent comment articulated, is that string theories and whatnot often predict untestable and unverifiable results. This is not an attack on all physics theorists - rather, it's a criticism on the fashionable line of research into string theories and other unverifiable theories.
Re:Physicists and Philosophers Debate the Boundaries of Science by lmm on Monday December 21, 2015 @04:49AM (#10770363)
"Then I would feel sorry for the good Lord; the theory is correct". Einstein's theories were ultimately verified, but only long after they were completed. Research into string theory is driven by its theoretical elegance in exactly the same way as Einstein's original SR work.
Re:Physicists and Philosophers Debate the Boundaries of Science by tmptmp on Monday December 21, 2015 @10:07AM (#10771358)
>> untestable and unverifiable ...

As someone has pointed out above, these theroies are surely "untestable and unverifiable" for now but that doesn't make them unfalsifiable so we must not critisize the theorists just because we cannot test and verify them.