Re:89, 263, 201, 500, 337, 480
by shmageggy on Friday December 18, 2015 @09:13PM
(#10762309)
Perhaps, but I think it equally or even more likely that it was intentional. This is someone who went through immense trouble to set up a system that is otherwise rather elaborate and detailed. Maybe he just hacked together the last bit and botched it with a ~25% error rate, or maybe there's more to the story that we've yet to figure out.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.