Re:Big Company vs. Startup Work and Compensation
by r0m4n0 on Friday December 18, 2015 @04:22PM
(#10761033)
I'm sorry but... if you were a senior software engineer in Sacramento (a metropolitan city) and asked for 200k at intel, hp, oracle, apple, etc., someone would quietly hang up the phone hahaha. A laughable amount is even closer to 150k if it wasn't a tech giant ie. Sutter, Blue Shield, Proctor & Gamble, PG&E, Franklin Templeton, etc.
Lead, architect, principal... they may not hang up but I would expect a double take and a "let's be realistic."
Re:Big Company vs. Startup Work and Compensation
by infinite8s on Saturday December 19, 2015 @05:16PM
(#10765108)
This whole conversation is about pay at tech companies, where developers are the primary revenue generator, as opposed to other industries where developers are generally considered a cost center.
Re:Big Company vs. Startup Work and Compensation
by spydum on Friday December 18, 2015 @07:23PM
(#10761969)
Agreed, doesn't take much looking on sites like glassdoor to confirm.. Most salary bands for principal roles are 120-150k w/ 15-20k bonus and occasionally same in stock.
Re:Big Company vs. Startup Work and Compensation
by mahyarm on Saturday December 19, 2015 @01:09AM
(#10762821)
When Sacramento is a 2 hour drive away, why don't you move to Fremont and work in SF, Mountain View or San Jose?
Re:Big Company vs. Startup Work and Compensation
by humanrebar on Friday December 18, 2015 @04:07PM
(#10760936)
> Are you at a large company in a metropolitan area?
...on the West Coast or Northeast, sure. It's my understanding that $250k is a little high for other cities, unfortunately. Hopefully the corporate culture there catches up.
Otherwise, a lot of engineers are getting used to living off of some sort of bubble.
If you answered yes to all three, yes, you are probably underpaid. That doesn't mean you're doing something wrong if you love your job, but know that you could earn more.