News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bug Bounty Ethics by ryanlol on Thursday December 17, 2015 @05:46PM (#10755194)
> that in itself breaks their ToS for the bug bounty program

Except it doesn't?

Re:Bug Bounty Ethics by Mandatum on Thursday December 17, 2015 @05:49PM (#10755208)
Once RCE is confirmed, any further access from there would break ToS. It's bullshit, and kind of a cop-out - but it's a trade-off that these companies have to make. Otherwise we could employ techniques like social engineering to gain internal access, then start pen-testing from within the network.
Re:Bug Bounty Ethics by ryanlol on Thursday December 17, 2015 @05:50PM (#10755213)
Their ToS does not state this. They do however specifically state that social engineering attacks are not eligible.
Re:Bug Bounty Ethics by Mandatum on Thursday December 17, 2015 @06:02PM (#10755301)
You're actually correct. I think this situation is a bit more complicated than it seems at first.

Updated original reply.

Re:Bug Bounty Ethics by franjkovic on Thursday December 17, 2015 @06:07PM (#10755338)
I'd say it does.

Not interact with other accounts without the consent of their owners.

Edit: whoops I mis-read this a bit, but the point still stands - he escalated using AWS keypair that did not belong to him, and he had no consent of the owner.

Re:Bug Bounty Ethics by ryanlol on Thursday December 17, 2015 @06:07PM (#10755342)
Obviously that's referring to facebook accounts.

Edit: I feel that your edit is still stretching the terms a bit. It seems pretty clear that this isn't the abuse that the clause intends to prevent.

Also, the guy seems to only have verified that the credentials worked.