News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fed Ends Zero-Rate Era by crdoconnor on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @07:07PM (#10748469)
I'm not at all concerned about economists who are "for" or "against" the minimum wage. They can hold whatever opinions they want if they don't lie.

It's the economists who poorly design studies with the intent of demonstrating that it either causes prices to rise uncontrollably (which it doesn't), causes unemployment to rise (which it also doesn't) and who pointedly never, ever, ever look at the effect it has on profits (it is savage towards profits, which is why the marketing budgets for stuff like this gets approved: http://kron4.com/2014/07/18/new-sf-billboard-says-workers-wi...).

They all know where the money is in their profession: it's at ideological corporate think tanks. If you can tread the fine line between not lying and saying things which they really like you've got a good career ahead of you.

As it happens, 'moral' arguments that say that you shouldn't raise the minimum wage work better when you can claim that it will hurt the people it is designed to help. Those arguments fall flat on their face when it becomes apparent that raising the minimum wage just transfers profits into workers' pockets directly.

Re:Fed Ends Zero-Rate Era by greggman on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @10:52PM (#10749399)
It sounds like you've dismissed any economist who doesn't agree with you.

You claim raising the minimum wage would never raise prices nor cause unemployment to rise. Ok, let's set it to $1000 a hr. Do you really think that would have no effect on either of those? Maybe there's some range on increase where the effects are offset by other effects but it's not lying to believe those effects will become real at some point.

Re:Fed Ends Zero-Rate Era by crdoconnor on Thursday December 17, 2015 @12:56AM (#10749849)
It hits profits first and hardest. Raise it significantly and it also causes prices to rise. Raise it to stupendous levels (in the US probably > $40-50 hr) and it eventually causes unemployment.

Realistically speaking, though, most arguments are over minimum wage hikes that only affect profits and won't even have a minimal effect on prices. $10 -> $12 isn't even going to cause prices to rise, let alone have an effect on employment. It'll go straight from profits to paychecks.

I can think of only one instance where raising the minimum wage actually affected employment, actually, and that was because it was set at first world levels in a third world environment.

Re:Fed Ends Zero-Rate Era by canicode on Thursday December 17, 2015 @01:36AM (#10749976)
If something is going to have an effect on profits, you can bet on the fact that a company will fight against it, hard. Because SHOCKER the point of a business is to generate PROFITS.

I think you're wrong in thinking that businesses will just give up, and take lower profits. No. They're going to cut hours, fire anyone they can, etc. to maintain their existing profit levels.

Re:Fed Ends Zero-Rate Era by crdoconnor on Thursday December 17, 2015 @10:24AM (#10751948)
If you have a laser like focus on maximizing profit (and supposedly most businesses do), you've already fired everybody you can and cut all the hours you're able to already.

But no, they don't just sit there and take it. They pile money into think tanks and advertising campaigns in order to try to sway public opinion (see above).

One of my favorite tactics is when they pretend that robots that do minimum wage jobs all cost $minimum wage + $1 and raising wages is simply going to make them all go out and buy those magical robots.

Re:Fed Ends Zero-Rate Era by vezzy-fnord on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @07:12PM (#10748500)
Economists are agents of bourgeoisie capitalism, then. Alright, I'll end here.
Re:Fed Ends Zero-Rate Era by crdoconnor on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @07:19PM (#10748527)
Well, we shouldn't pretend that they don't respond to incentives.
Re:Fed Ends Zero-Rate Era by rodgerd on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @07:40PM (#10748633)
A well-sourced argument you've got there.
Re:Fed Ends Zero-Rate Era by vezzy-fnord on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @07:52PM (#10748685)
What else is there to say about the GP's blanket assertions of opinion being bought out by corporate think tanks and a link to an article about labor-related strife? It's a predetermined conclusion.
Re:Fed Ends Zero-Rate Era by canicode on Thursday December 17, 2015 @01:32AM (#10749963)
Please read this: https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/3ulzdy/e...

Raising the minimum wage WILL increase unemployment. That's Economics 101. Companies are going to find ways to fire people, or give them fewer hours. Raising the minimum wage to something like $15 would be ludicrous.

Re:Fed Ends Zero-Rate Era by bildung on Thursday December 17, 2015 @02:58AM (#10750183)
> Raising the minimum wage WILL increase unemployment.

Reality disagrees :) Germany introduced minimum wage recently and the opposite of your prediction happened.

The argument didn't match reality because it completely ignores the growth of purchasing power that is a consequence of higer wages.

Re:Fed Ends Zero-Rate Era by crdoconnor on Thursday December 17, 2015 @08:33AM (#10751332)
Econ 101 is "look at what happened in Australia". The commenter addresses that actually but his response is really lame. "Things are just different there". Uh huh.

Actually this is pretty much a model for what would happen to McDonalds in the US:

http://uk.businessinsider.com/mcdonalds-in-australia-vs-amer...

Re:Fed Ends Zero-Rate Era by TheOtherHobbes on Thursday December 17, 2015 @02:36AM (#10750132)
Nonsense. That's simply wrong.

And if Econ 101 states it's true, then Econ 101 is wrong too.

Here's a more fact-based explanation, with links to studies and comments by economists:

http://www.dol.gov/minwage/mythbuster.htm