Re:Show HN: Convert scanned documents into searchable PDFs
by jiaweihli on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @03:48PM
(#10747215)
Have you looked into ocropy[0]?
Here's a nice intro[1] that later talks about how it achieves higher accuracy using an LSTM model[2].
[0] https://github.com/tmbdev/ocropy
[1] http://www.danvk.org/2015/01/09/extracting-text-from-an-imag...
[2] http://www.danvk.org/2015/01/11/training-an-ocropus-ocr-mode...
Re:Show HN: Convert scanned documents into searchable PDFs
by cfcef on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @04:52PM
(#10747637)
I have not. It sounds interesting but raw and unsuitable for end-users. I hope the quality improves and they can get it packaged up in a way that existing document scanners can plug into easily.
Re:Show HN: Convert scanned documents into searchable PDFs
by jahewson on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @06:48PM
(#10748346)
Note that the primary author of ocropy (formerly ocropus) works at Google.
Re:Show HN: Convert scanned documents into searchable PDFs
by acdha on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @04:42PM
(#10747574)
Is the problem really Tesseract or the fact that it doesn't have a robust front-end performing segmentation, de-skewing, better binarization, etc? I've heard that Google Books is actually using the Tesseract engine but has seen better results in part from better training but mostly from a more advanced system breaking each page into the blocks of text which are actually OCRed.
What the OCR market needs is someone who will bring that level of OCR quality - or better - to the masses (perhaps some deep learning grad student with time to kill?), not yet another wrapper around Tesseract. We have those already!