CSS3 proven to be Turing complete?

Re:CSS3 proven to be Turing complete? by Nadya on Tuesday December 15, 2015 @01:27PM (#10739449)

What? Flex doesn't need a prefix and hasn't for ages (since version 20. It's on 50 now)

Furthermore, it's best that features are behind prefixes to be used for progressive enhancement and any major browser implements new features behind a prefix before it is accepted.

There is no "cross browser hacks" for any evergreen browser. Except, ironically given your statement, IE has a buggy implementation. Edge supports it and Microsoft is deprecating IE<11 and will hopefully fix the issues in IE11. The big issues can be avoided by not declaring a min-height.

http://caniuse.com/#feat=flexbox

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CSS3 proven to be Turing complete? by anonbanker on Tuesday December 15, 2015 @01:35PM (#10739508)

yes, beta features should be behind a prefix. that's all established.

However, if vertical alignment is still prefixed in 2015, I don't think I need to submit more for my case, downvoted as it may be.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CSS3 proven to be Turing complete? by Nadya on Tuesday December 15, 2015 @01:36PM (#10739510)

But it isn't, which is why you're getting downvoted.

Although the outdated example is largely to blame.

[ Parent | on HN ]