CSS3 proven to be Turing complete?

Re:CSS3 proven to be Turing complete? by akerro on Tuesday December 15, 2015 @12:53PM (#10739200)

Can you center images yet? :>

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CSS3 proven to be Turing complete? by talmand on Tuesday December 15, 2015 @01:20PM (#10739401)

Such knowledge exists, but it requires a long and dangerous journey filled with adventure, thrills, and excitement too bold for most to endure. Many have traveled down that path, but few have returned to tell the tale.

I am one of those few.

I could easily share that knowledge, but for one to fully understand, one must walk such a path thyself guided by the voices from the source that flows over the stacks of such knowledge.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CSS3 proven to be Turing complete? by gotchange on Tuesday December 15, 2015 @01:26PM (#10739446)

As I walk through the valley of shadow of vertical-align, I took a look at my codebase and I realize there isn't much left ...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CSS3 proven to be Turing complete? by forrestthewoods on Tuesday December 15, 2015 @01:28PM (#10739453)

http://howtocenterincss.com/

Good luck and God speed. There's no shame in turning back.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CSS3 proven to be Turing complete? by dasil003 on Tuesday December 15, 2015 @12:58PM (#10739252)

I get the joke since I've been doing the web design thing for a couple decades at this point, but in case your question was serious, yes it is finally solved:

https://philipwalton.github.io/solved-by-flexbox/demos/verti...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CSS3 proven to be Turing complete? by meesterdude on Tuesday December 15, 2015 @01:00PM (#10739270)

came to say the same thing. I love love love flexbox. I just wish i could drop all the vendor prefixes, but safari seems to be the holdout iirc

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CSS3 proven to be Turing complete? by gotchange on Tuesday December 15, 2015 @01:22PM (#10739414)

Isn't IE =< 10 supported by the Felxbox model?

[ Parent | on HN ]