Re:Faraday Future picks Nevada over California to build a $1...
by Ironchefpython on Friday December 11, 2015 @09:35PM
(#10721544)
> Why not provide a future tax break? Put the taxes you'd normally pay in escrow and release them when the company meets it's obligations?
See race to the bottom. Companies simply shop around for a set of tax breaks that doesn't come with strings attached.
> A private company is pulling the wools over a sovereign power with the ability to create and enforce it's own laws?
You mean people with money are influencing elected officials who need their money to win elections.
Re:Faraday Future picks Nevada over California to build a $1...
by blakeshall on Friday December 11, 2015 @07:13PM
(#10721072)
I like the escrow idea. I've also seen forgivable loans based on certain obligations (hiring, salary levels, etc.)
But they are taking advantage of a bunch of things; local governments inability to govern certain areas (whether due to state or federal laws) or that the mayor is thinking about election time and who would say jobs are bad?
I just find the idea that private businesses are "taking advantage" of governments with these agreements. Really? A private company is pulling the wools over a sovereign power with the ability to create and enforce it's own laws?