Re:Can Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes Fend Off Her Critics?
by sk5t on Friday December 11, 2015 @12:02AM
(#10715543)
Strongly agreed on the company's likely intent to integrate monitoring into US military training and deployment kits... imagine the military benefit in knowing every soldier's blood panel and derived data such as stress level on a near-continuous basis--that's a real force multiplier. Worth $10K/yr/man easily.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Can Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes Fend Off Her Critics?
by anon4this1 on Friday December 11, 2015 @03:24AM
(#10715982)
MD here. The vast majority of soldiers are fit and healthy and will have completely normal labs 99% of the time. The times when they are not normal will be insignificant 99% of the time (had a few drinks last night? your GGT level will be slightly above normal briefly). This information is worth next to nothing to anyone.
Re:Can Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes Fend Off Her Critics?
by sk5t on Friday December 11, 2015 @12:19PM
(#10718322)
Do soldiers remain so healthy-by-the-numbers in the field? I'm wondering if many data points would help to identify individuals on the edge of becoming unfit.
Re:Can Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes Fend Off Her Critics?
by anon4this1 on Friday December 11, 2015 @03:28AM
(#10715991)
Oh .. and another thing.
I do point of care needlestick blood testing on people every day. I check haemoglobin and blood sugar levels. When doing a needlestick test for Hb I always do it twice because these results are often spurious (especially when you "milk" blood out of the finger). The Hb/liter figure can vary by as much as 20-30% routinely. If this is the case I then do a proper venous draw to find the true result. These tests are marginally useful in screening for really low or really high values, but they are pretty much inadequate compared to a proper venous draw for clinical decision making.