Probably because if you had an old set and were watching on Ch2 but your neighbor was watching the same thing on Ch1 on a new set, that could have been a bit confusing at the dawn of television.
Or, watch ABC news on Ch2 on old sets, but Ch1 on new sets...., wait, do I have an old set or a new set?
Re:Whatever happened to Channel 1?
by TazeTSchnitzel on Thursday December 10, 2015 @06:44AM
(#10710149)
I would assume they didn't renumber because TV was becoming popular at this point and it would be a hassle.
you tl;dr people are doing the lord's work. thank you
Re:Whatever happened to Channel 1?
by sethkontny on Thursday December 10, 2015 @02:39AM
(#10709394)
So instead of reading. --> fast paced audio.
Re:Whatever happened to Channel 1?
by PhasmaFelis on Thursday December 10, 2015 @05:19AM
(#10709883)
I can read faster than any human can speak intelligibly. Also, it's much easier to skip ahead with text.
You'd think the article would explore why they didn't renumber, but nope.
Legacy hardware and possible consumer confusion seem like the most likely speculation.