News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mozilla Will Stop Developing and Selling Firefox OS Smart... by rsync on Wednesday December 09, 2015 @12:11AM (#10702023)
Serious question for you and your parent:

Why would a pastebin site need auth/login/userids ?

All I can think of is editing pastes, but isn't it easier to just create a new (anonymous) paste instead of editing ?

Re:Mozilla Will Stop Developing and Selling Firefox OS Smart... by DHowett on Wednesday December 09, 2015 @01:44AM (#10702285)
They're primarily for content ownership management.

I'd prefer not to have accounts, and Ghostbin tries to avoid keeping identifiable information around, but they do come in fairly handy for maintaining control of the things you've pasted and the right to revoke them.

Session cookies aren't quite up to the task, since they can't stick around forever and are difficult to bring with you between workspaces.

(edit to elaborate on "avoid keeping identifiable information": account names are hashed, the account never stores user identification, and a paste doesn't track which account created it. For most intents and many purposes, the creator of a paste is anonymous. We could get into drawing correlations between all the pastes owned by an account, but I'm not particularly interested in sitting around and doing that.)

Re:Mozilla Will Stop Developing and Selling Firefox OS Smart... by lotyrin on Wednesday December 09, 2015 @01:28AM (#10702242)
Deletion. Modification of pastes and maintaining the same id (URL).

Though, these can be solved with tokens per post, it's tough to remember/maintain multiple tokens, doesn't work out in practice.

Re:Mozilla Will Stop Developing and Selling Firefox OS Smart... by r-w on Sunday December 13, 2015 @12:55PM (#10727102)
Preventing inundation with pastes. This is less of a problem for a small project like this compared to one of the major sites, whose server architecture is probably more robust.