News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Satoshi Nakamoto Is Probably This Unknown Australian Genius?. Parent comment

Re:Satoshi Nakamoto Is Probably This Unknown Australian Genius? by mortehu on Tuesday December 08, 2015 @08:51PM (#10701351)
I have looked at the GPG keys, and based on the hash algorithm preference order, I believe they were created after [edit: July 2009], by a gnupg version following this[1] commit, on a computer with its clock set to 2008.

1. http://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=gnupg.git;a=commit... [edited]

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Satoshi Nakamoto Is Probably This Unknown Australian Genius? by 4oh9do on Tuesday December 08, 2015 @09:48PM (#10701598)
If this is true, then it's pretty substantial evidence that this guy is a hoaxer.

But can you really tell when a key-pair was generated? This would make for a fascinating write-up if you could please spend the time to explain.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Satoshi Nakamoto Is Probably This Unknown Australian Genius? by qume on Tuesday December 08, 2015 @09:36PM (#10701540)
Which hash did he use?

The change you link to has the same SHA-256 as the first option both before and after the change.

Did he use something else?

I'm curious to know your thoughts on the scenario whereby another hash would be chosen for him by the software, and whether or not he may have chosen a specific hash?

This is potentially a good line of enquiry with more info

[ Parent | on HN ]