Re:Richard Prince, the world’s highest-grossing “photographer”
by esharte on Tuesday December 08, 2015 @11:05AM
(#10697174)
I get that a photograph can qualify as having it's own copyright. But what he's done here is take a screenshot on iOS. Surely screenshots don't qualify as photographs.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Richard Prince, the world’s highest-grossing “photographer”
by wavefunction on Tuesday December 08, 2015 @11:40AM
(#10697463)
Generally reuse of copyrighted materials need to be transformative in some way, and to many people following this artist he is not doing that.
Also, I don't like him or his concept of art. Maybe if he was donating most of the proceeds to charity with enough to make a living.