News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Best Books I Read in 2015. Parent comment

Re:The Best Books I Read in 2015 by gnrme on Monday December 07, 2015 @07:02PM (#10693783)
Goodreads rating system is useless anyway. It's 'out of five' which means most people will give a good book a 4 or a 5 star - it's not like IMDb's more nuanced 'out of ten' rating.

They also display a bespoke meaning for the stars (i.e. 3 doesn't mean average), so for those that follow that meaning, their ratings will be different.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Best Books I Read in 2015 by andreygrehov on Monday December 07, 2015 @09:23PM (#10694376)
There is an interesting read as for the ratings on Amazon vs Goodreads vs B&N:

http://www.thenewdorkreviewofbooks.com/2011/06/amazon-vs-b-v...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Best Books I Read in 2015 by jay_kyburz on Monday December 07, 2015 @07:21PM (#10693905)
I find it's still a fairly good indicator. Last time I was looking for a new author I went back and compared the author's average rating. Authors I like were 4+. Authors I think are OK scored about 3.5. Authors who I won't read again were generally 3 or so.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Best Books I Read in 2015 by gnrme on Monday December 07, 2015 @07:35PM (#10693957)
Perhaps 'useless' is a strong word. It's good for getting a general idea but too many books hover around the 4 mark. Whereas with IMDb anything 6 and above is worth the risk.
[ Parent | on HN ]