News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Best Books I Read in 2015 by tlrobinson on Monday December 07, 2015 @05:03PM (#10693078)
Perhaps, but taking a famous person's list of books and reposting it with affiliate links and no disclaimer is definitely crossing the line in my book.
Re:The Best Books I Read in 2015 by davidw on Monday December 07, 2015 @05:20PM (#10693190)
Don't think I might have upvoted it, but it does represent a minor convenience.
Re:The Best Books I Read in 2015 by manish_gill on Monday December 07, 2015 @08:23PM (#10694154)
Why? I'm genuinely interesting in your line of reasoning.
Re:The Best Books I Read in 2015 by hueving on Monday December 07, 2015 @08:35PM (#10694200)
Profiteering in comment sections pollutes the incentives for commenters. Sure the links were useful, but they were much less useful than a person providing a really insightful comment about a typical article that shows up here. I don't want one person making monetary gain over another.
Re:The Best Books I Read in 2015 by andreyf on Monday December 07, 2015 @11:17PM (#10694771)
If only there was a system where we could somehow crowdsource deciding which comments are "really insightful" and which are not...
Re:The Best Books I Read in 2015 by davidw on Tuesday December 08, 2015 @12:29PM (#10697857)
> I don't want one person making monetary gain over another.

Seems like that shipped sailed a long time ago: there are a lot of people who link to their companies, offer jobs, and that kind of thing here. Making money is not a bad thing - spamming is.

If anyone's interested, I hereby offer to spend the entirety of my ill-gotten affiliate gains on beers if anyone ever visits Bend, Oregon.