News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Examining IPv6 Performance by voltagex_ on Sunday December 06, 2015 @04:04PM (#10686604)
>Update: The IPv6 addresses which are used appear to be fictional. They haven’t been allocated yet and are non-routable.

What kind of network are they using that lets them send forged source addresses? Also, a temporary solution in that case would be to use a blocklist of non-allocated ranges.

Re:Examining IPv6 Performance by the_mitsuhiko on Sunday December 06, 2015 @04:08PM (#10686619)
BT is UDP and you can write whatever you want into a packet.
Re:Examining IPv6 Performance by banthar on Sunday December 06, 2015 @04:27PM (#10686700)
Are you talking about changing source address in IP header? Most ISPs will drop such packets: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3013#section-4.3
Re:Examining IPv6 Performance by voltagex_ on Sunday December 06, 2015 @05:25PM (#10686937)
That's what I thought - but it turns out that not all ISPs behave well.

https://defcon.org/images/defcon-22/dc-22-presentations/Grah... but the video is also very entertaining. This is applicable to the IPv4 internet but I'm sure someone will eventually come up with a way to do it for IPv6.

Re:Examining IPv6 Performance by voltagex_ on Sunday December 06, 2015 @04:20PM (#10686677)
Right. Looks like I'll have to add some networking to my to-learn list. Thanks.
Re:Examining IPv6 Performance by feld on Sunday December 06, 2015 @06:44PM (#10687247)
BCP38 is what you want everyone to implement

http://bcp38.org