News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The patent on the Space Shuttle has expired by chrislloyd on Saturday December 05, 2015 @06:25PM (#10683681)
I know very little about the topic, but is that a thing? Surely just publishing (without asserting ownership) could establish prior art?
Re:The patent on the Space Shuttle has expired by fnordsensei on Saturday December 05, 2015 @06:35PM (#10683721)
Any sufficiently large organization tends to become host to a population of defensive lawyers, which then produces patents as a side effect of building themselves a nest out of legal documents. Isn't nature beautiful?
Re:The patent on the Space Shuttle has expired by bdonlan on Saturday December 05, 2015 @06:30PM (#10683700)
In theory, yes. In practice, patent examiners mostly only look at patents when checking for prior art. Once someone else gets a patent for your invention you'll face a costly legal process to invalidate the bogus patent.
Re:The patent on the Space Shuttle has expired by URSpider94 on Saturday December 05, 2015 @08:21PM (#10683990)
While that may be true for generically publishing the work online, there are dedicated disclosure journals that are included in prior art searches by patent examiners. If you want to publish as an alternative to patenting, this is where you do it.
Re:The patent on the Space Shuttle has expired by GFK_of_xmaspast on Saturday December 05, 2015 @07:06PM (#10683806)
"My reckons" are not generally reliable when it comes to law.