Re:Machine learning works spectacularly well, but mathematic...
by eli_gottlieb on Friday December 04, 2015 @10:52AM
(#10676962)
>The very notion of generalization to unobserved data is not well understood (I like D. Wolpert papers on that topic).
Which papers?
Re:Machine learning works spectacularly well, but mathematic...
by cdavid on Friday December 04, 2015 @11:42AM
(#10677317)
IIRC, that one was a decent overview, though he has worked on similar issues in older papers: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.99.1...
It has been a while since I read those papers, there may better references.
In 'machine learning', structured learning by Vapnik and co (theory behind SVM), has a beautiful and strong mathematical underpinning. But in general, it is true we don't really have a good understanding of why learning algorithms work. The very notion of generalization to unobserved data is not well understood (I like D. Wolpert papers on that topic).