News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Metabase: Why we picked Clojure by j-pb on Wednesday December 02, 2015 @05:42PM (#10666416)
You do it in a different language that isn't haskel or ml and show me the result, then we can judge.

You'd btw probably write it as.

  (->> (range)
       (map #(repeat % (odd? %)))
       (apply concat)
       (take 1000)
If you want it more readable.
Re:Metabase: Why we picked Clojure by sanderjd on Wednesday December 02, 2015 @07:44PM (#10666985)
You missed a closing paren :)
Re:Metabase: Why we picked Clojure by huahaiy on Wednesday December 02, 2015 @08:10PM (#10667068)
It shows that Lisp programmers really don't care about balancing parenthesis, because editors do that for them.
Re:Metabase: Why we picked Clojure by j-pb on Thursday December 03, 2015 @04:37AM (#10668707)
Yeah, I really love the new parinfer stuff :D
Re:Metabase: Why we picked Clojure by j-pb on Thursday December 03, 2015 @04:36AM (#10668701)
whops ^^°