News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Cannons on the B-29 Bomber by Tloewald on Wednesday December 02, 2015 @11:03AM (#10663728)
Given that the Bradley was designed to fight Eastern Bloc forces on the plains of Germany (which comprises rolling terrain, closely spaced villages, streams, etc.) a vehicle that can be tucked behind cover and fire lethal anti-tank missiles isn't just decoration.

One of the most interesting cold war AFVs was an M113 chassis with a cherry picker and 15 TOW missiles on it. Armor is nice, but a hill is even nicer.

The problem is that the US army is still equipping itself superbly to fight the Eastern Bloc in 1985.

Re:The Cannons on the B-29 Bomber by gherkin0 on Wednesday December 02, 2015 @12:55PM (#10664561)
> One of the most interesting cold war AFVs was an M113 chassis with a cherry picker and 15 TOW missiles on it. Armor is nice, but a hill is even nicer.

Is this what you're talking about? http://russian-tanks.com/the-m901-armored-missile-vehicle.ph...

Re:The Cannons on the B-29 Bomber by xixi77 on Wednesday December 02, 2015 @01:03PM (#10664623)
= One of the most interesting cold war AFVs was an M113 chassis with a cherry picker and 15 TOW missiles on it. Armor is nice, but a hill is even nicer. =

Interesting, never heard of that one! Any links by any chance? I would be curious to look at pictures :) (Edit: looks like another reply has a link!)

And IMO it makes perfect sense for the first priority to be always prepared for the toughest opponent: a TOW missile will destroy a pickup truck just fine, but it also forces the opponent to be much more careful with their tanks.