News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Decade-Old Gag Order, Lifted by jacquesm on Tuesday December 01, 2015 @09:08AM (#10655377)
That was testimony under oath. If it was false testimony the penalties would be grave which somewhat reduces the chances of it being 'obviously made up'.
Re:A Decade-Old Gag Order, Lifted by dmix on Tuesday December 01, 2015 @11:23AM (#10656546)
Of note, her allegation regarding blackmailing a congresswoman was against Turkish agents whom the FBI was wiretapping, not the FBI themselves. In her deposition she specifically says

> [...] information was being collected for blackmail purposes, and her lesbian relationship, and they, the Turkish entities, wanted both congressional related favoritism from her, but also her husband was in a high position in the area in the state she was elected from, and these Turkish entities ran certain illegal operations, and they wanted her husband's help. But I don't know if she provided them with those. I left. I was terminated.

Re:A Decade-Old Gag Order, Lifted by tptacek on Tuesday December 01, 2015 @10:29AM (#10656020)
The penalties for lying under oath are usually anything but grave. Moreover: to punish her, the state has to prove that she knowingly lied. But I believe she believes what she's saying. That doesn't mean she's right.