Re:Men’s and Women’s Brains Appear to Age Differently
by groth on Sunday November 29, 2015 @12:11PM
(#10645202)
not at all. the 'facts' are obviously out there, but it's not the job of a university president to promote them, especially when their facticity is a) indispute and b) promotes expectations and norms in society that could and do adversely effects a segment of it.
summers is still a faculty member at harvard, he's just no longer president, and no longer speaking for the institution
Re:Men’s and Women’s Brains Appear to Age Differently
by force_reboot on Sunday November 29, 2015 @12:19PM
(#10645244)
All facts are going to be interpreted differently. So (a) alone is clearly not a good criterion. But if you are saying that (a) and (b) combined imply that a statement should be forbidden, then my critique still applies.
If you forbid Larry Summers from forming one plausible opinion based on the facts, even though you allow others (e.g. the opposite opinion), then your reasoning still must be along the lines that I outlined.
Why can't the public be trusted with the fact that Larry Summers draws one opinion from the data, even though other people have drawn different opinions.
Whenever your reasoning contains something like (b), my critique is going to apply, because you are arguing against a viewpoint based on its consequences, not on its truth (even if you also doubt its truth).
For example you assume the existence of some people who believe that a liberal democratic society requires women in science and tech, even if they are inherently less able in these fields. Why then, can't these people explain to the public why this is the case, so that the public will then accept the need for women in these fields, regardless of the truth regarding IQ?