Re:The New Atomic Age We Need
by chadgeidel on Saturday November 28, 2015 @02:55PM
(#10642159)
Do you have sources for radioactivity in coal ash? It's not that I believe you (I do!) I would just like info to share with others.
Unrelated - I'm sorry I downvoted you - stupid tiny hit box on mobile. I meant to upvote.
Re:The New Atomic Age We Need
by Amorymeltzer on Saturday November 28, 2015 @03:02PM
(#10642189)
Here are three quick links, from 2007, 2015, and 1997, respectively:
>http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coal-ash-is-more-r...
>https://nicholas.duke.edu/news/radioactive-contaminants-foun...
Re:The New Atomic Age We Need
by ScottBurson on Saturday November 28, 2015 @03:11PM
(#10642233)
There's this SciAm article, but the title is sensationalized and highly misleading; be sure to read the whole article, including the editor's note at the end.
> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coal-ash-is-more-r...
Actually, most of the risk of coal power is soot in the air, causing respiratory problems. This has killed far more people than coal mining. But most people don't know that, as your comment illustrates. So part of the problem is that the risks of other power sources are not accurately represented.
(Also, btw, there is radioactivity in coal ash--more than in some types of nuclear waste.)