News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:'Li-fi 100 times faster than wi-fi' by schappim on Friday November 27, 2015 @06:31PM (#10639337)
Great, but you can't use it in the dark! Perhaps they could fix this with infrared?
Re:'Li-fi 100 times faster than wi-fi' by hanniabu on Friday November 27, 2015 @09:22PM (#10639745)
I forget where I saw this (think it may have actually been a video), but they said the latest versions could work with the lights off as it is still flickering the light, but just dinner than what we could perceive. Of course this could with the assumption that the source I hard it from was correct and if so, then it's probably only feasible with lab grade sensors to pick up signals that sensitive.
Re:'Li-fi 100 times faster than wi-fi' by AYBABTME on Friday November 27, 2015 @07:02PM (#10639438)
or UVs..!
Re:'Li-fi 100 times faster than wi-fi' by snerbles on Friday November 27, 2015 @07:31PM (#10639511)
...then wireless networking really will cause cancer.
Re:'Li-fi 100 times faster than wi-fi' by the8472 on Friday November 27, 2015 @07:39PM (#10639532)
maybe a deep violet right at the edge of the visible spectrum? all you would see is a faint glow
Re:'Li-fi 100 times faster than wi-fi' by drdaeman on Friday November 27, 2015 @11:01PM (#10639975)
I'm not sure but I heard short wavelength (blue/violet) visible light has most impact on circadian rhythms.

If it's indeed the case, insomnia or any other kind of sleep disorder is not worth it.

Re:'Li-fi 100 times faster than wi-fi' by TeMPOraL on Friday November 27, 2015 @11:01PM (#10639976)
Ok, but you'll be the one to explain to people who don't want to accept the ionizing/non-ionizing radiation distinction that this sort-of-UV is not the cancer-causing UV.