Re:Blockchain technology could reduce role of banks, says BIS
by dustingetz on Friday November 27, 2015 @12:20AM
(#10635978)
My understanding is that bitcoin has been broken for quite some time as there have been multiple 51% events from mining pools, it's just more profitable (for now) for these parties to keep the status quo
Re:Blockchain technology could reduce role of banks, says BIS
by nmj on Friday November 27, 2015 @12:30AM
(#10636004)
Your understanding is incorrect.
Re:Blockchain technology could reduce role of banks, says BIS
by inoop on Friday November 27, 2015 @03:09AM
(#10636375)
> What we've learned from Bitcoin is that blockchain technology is robust enough to strongly resist attacks.
Bitcoin is highly vulnerable to spam attacks (as demonstrated several times), malleability, and has forked twice so far, with a double-spend demonstrated during one of them.
Sure Bitcoin's crypto hasn't been broken, but how is that impressive? Bitcoin did not innovate there in any way. It's not like Satoshi invented Merkle trees (otherwise I'm sure they'd be called Satoshi trees:)
What we've learned from Bitcoin is that blockchain technology is robust enough to strongly resist attacks. If it were profitably breakable, it would have been broken by now. That it hasn't been is quite impressive.
As a settlement system, it doesn't require "mining" - just enough mutually mistrustful players that no one can tamper with logged transactions.