Re:Macbook charger teardown: surprising complexity inside Ap...
by cxseven on Thursday November 26, 2015 @03:07AM
(#10631858)
I wonder how patenting a specific implementation of an already-known thing is allowed. Why is this considered an original invention?
Among other things, it violates the intent of patents "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts".
Re:Macbook charger teardown: surprising complexity inside Ap...
by tim333 on Thursday November 26, 2015 @09:05AM
(#10632992)
I think they've patented innovations in their thing like you can put it in either way up and it's got a chip with little lights in the end. They waffle on for pages in http://www.google.com/patents/US7311526
I'm not sure they should be able to patent fairly simple upgrades like that but I guess that's the US patent system.
Just goes to show that there are plenty of places where Apple doesn't do much thinking different after all.