News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New Shepard: Bezos claims success on second spaceship flight by Already__Taken on Tuesday November 24, 2015 @09:45AM (#10620966)
This is super cool, in case any of their engineers read this thread congratulations.

To jump in with the inevitable SpaceX comparison. Worth noting is you see the Blue Origin booster: fall, slow, hover, correct any drift, descend then land. The SpaceX booster cannot hover, it has more thrust than it weighs.

Re:New Shepard: Bezos claims success on second spaceship flight by alienasa on Tuesday November 24, 2015 @09:49AM (#10620998)
Further point of clarification, the SpaceX booster has more thrust than it weighs because it is capable of delivering payloads to orbit, which the Blue Origin booster cannot do.
Re:New Shepard: Bezos claims success on second spaceship flight by ggreer on Tuesday November 24, 2015 @01:38PM (#10622563)
All rockets have more thrust than their weight, otherwise they would not get off the ground.

Hover ability comes from having a rocket engine that can throttle down enough to match the weight of the almost-empty rocket. Blue Origin's BE-3 can throttle down to 20% of its design thrust, possibly lower.[1] SpaceX's Merlin 1D can throttle down to 70%.[2] Apparently, even with only one of the nine engines firing, it's enough to lift the almost-empty Falcon 9 first stage.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BE-3

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merlin_(rocket_engine_family)#...